| Question/Requirement | 3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
| What evidence exists showing that persons holding key leadership positions in the institution are qualified to carry out their responsibilities? | Target is met; question or requirement is clearly addressed with examples/samples that are easy to understand. Anyone reviewing this would gain knowledge of how the College meets/addresses this standard. No clarity is required. Full Compliance evident with Question/Requirement
|
Target is met; question or requirement is addressed with examples/samples; however, may not be clear to an external reviewer. I, in reviewing this information, still have some minor questions and/or feel the evidence (examples/ samples) provided do not demonstrate with 100% certainty compliance with this question/requirement
|
Target is addressed; however not clearly enough to demonstrate compliance. Partial Compliance may be evident, but this needs more explanation and/or documentation | Target in NOT met – This really misses the mark; any reviewer would state “non-compliance” based on the information and/or its presentation in the report. |
| If staff members with non-traditional credentials have been appointed, what evidence in their background and experience justifies their employment? | Target is met; question or requirement is clearly addressed with examples/samples that are easy to understand. Anyone reviewing this would gain knowledge of how the College meets/addresses this standard. No clarity is required. Full Compliance evident with Question/Requirement
|
Target is met; question or requirement is addressed with examples/samples; however, may not be clear to an external reviewer. I, in reviewing this information, still have some minor questions and/or feel the evidence (examples/ samples) provided do not demonstrate with 100% certainty compliance with this question/requirement
|
Target is addressed; however not clearly enough to demonstrate compliance. Partial Compliance may be evident, but this needs more explanation and/or documentation | Target in NOT met – This really misses the mark; any reviewer would state “non-compliance” based on the information and/or its presentation in the report. |
Included
|
Not Included
|
|
| Organizational chart with names of those appointed to academic and administrative posts | ||
| Names, positions, position descriptions, qualifications’
Resumes’ for senior-level academic and administrative officers |
| Comments:
|