| Question/Requirement | 3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
| Is the combination of credentials and experience appropriate for the positions held?
(Note: must be appropriate for dual (and more) roles held; so, some individuals will be listed more than one time) |
Target is met; question or requirement is clearly addressed with examples/samples that are easy to understand. Anyone reviewing this would gain knowledge of how the College meets/addresses this standard. No clarity is required. Full Compliance evident with Question/Requirement
|
Target is met; question or requirement is addressed with examples/samples; however, may not be clear to an external reviewer. I, in reviewing this information, still have some minor questions and/or feel the evidence (examples/ samples) provided do not demonstrate with 100% certainty compliance with this question/requirement
|
Target is addressed; however not clearly enough to demonstrate compliance. Partial Compliance may be evident, but this needs more explanation and/or documentation | Target in NOT met – This really misses the mark; any reviewer would state “non-compliance” based on the information and/or its presentation in the report. |
| Question/Requirement | 3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
| Do qualifications align with published position descriptions? | Target is met; question or requirement is clearly addressed with examples/samples that are easy to understand. Anyone reviewing this would gain knowledge of how the College meets/addresses this standard. No clarity is required. Full Compliance evident with Question/Requirement
|
Target is met; question or requirement is addressed with examples/samples; however, may not be clear to an external reviewer. I, in reviewing this information, still have some minor questions and/or feel the evidence (examples/ samples) provided do not demonstrate with 100% certainty compliance with this question/requirement
|
Target is addressed; however not clearly enough to demonstrate compliance. Partial Compliance may be evident, but this needs more explanation and/or documentation | Target in NOT met – This really misses the mark; any reviewer would state “non-compliance” based on the information and/or its presentation in the report. |
| Question/Requirement | 3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
| Does the institution follow its own expectations regarding credentials and experience, as reflected in position descriptions? | Target is met; question or requirement is clearly addressed with examples/samples that are easy to understand. Anyone reviewing this would gain knowledge of how the College meets/addresses this standard. No clarity is required. Full Compliance evident with Question/Requirement
|
Target is met; question or requirement is addressed with examples/samples; however, may not be clear to an external reviewer. I, in reviewing this information, still have some minor questions and/or feel the evidence (examples/ samples) provided do not demonstrate with 100% certainty compliance with this question/requirement
|
Target is addressed; however not clearly enough to demonstrate compliance. Partial Compliance may be evident, but this needs more explanation and/or documentation | Target in NOT met – This really misses the mark; any reviewer would state “non-compliance” based on the information and/or its presentation in the report. |
| Question/Requirement | 3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
| For persons in leadership positions who have nontraditional qualifications for their positions, what is the reasoning underlying these appointments? | Target is met; question or requirement is clearly addressed with examples/samples that are easy to understand. Anyone reviewing this would gain knowledge of how the College meets/addresses this standard. No clarity is required. Full Compliance evident with Question/Requirement
|
Target is met; question or requirement is addressed with examples/samples; however, may not be clear to an external reviewer. I, in reviewing this information, still have some minor questions and/or feel the evidence (examples/ samples) provided do not demonstrate with 100% certainty compliance with this question/requirement
|
Target is addressed; however not clearly enough to demonstrate compliance. Partial Compliance may be evident, but this needs more explanation and/or documentation | Target in NOT met – This really misses the mark; any reviewer would state “non-compliance” based on the information and/or its presentation in the report. |
| Question/Requirement | 3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
| For persons in leadership positions who have nontraditional qualifications for their positions, what is the reasoning underlying these appointments? | Target is met; question or requirement is clearly addressed with examples/samples that are easy to understand. Anyone reviewing this would gain knowledge of how the College meets/addresses this standard. No clarity is required. Full Compliance evident with Question/Requirement
|
Target is met; question or requirement is addressed with examples/samples; however, may not be clear to an external reviewer. I, in reviewing this information, still have some minor questions and/or feel the evidence (examples/ samples) provided do not demonstrate with 100% certainty compliance with this question/requirement
|
Target is addressed; however not clearly enough to demonstrate compliance. Partial Compliance may be evident, but this needs more explanation and/or documentation | Target in NOT met – This really misses the mark; any reviewer would state “non-compliance” based on the information and/or its presentation in the report. |
Included
|
Not Included
|
|
| Organizational charts to clarify the leadership roles and the names of the persons to be reviewed.
|
||
| Position descriptions and details as to appropriate qualifications for each person to be reviewed.
|
||
| Résumés. Résumés should be current.
|
| Comments:
|