| Question/Requirement | 3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
| For institutions with multiple sites, is the institutional identity clear across accreditors? | Target is met; question or requirement is clearly addressed with examples/samples that are easy to understand. Anyone reviewing this would gain knowledge of how the College meets/addresses this standard. No clarity is required. Full Compliance evident with Question/Requirement
|
Target is met; question or requirement is addressed with examples/samples; however, may not be clear to an external reviewer. I, in reviewing this information, still have some minor questions and/or feel the evidence (examples/ samples) provided do not demonstrate with 100% certainty compliance with this question/requirement
|
Target is addressed; however not clearly enough to demonstrate compliance. Partial Compliance may be evident, but this needs more explanation and/or documentation | Target in NOT met – This really misses the mark; any reviewer would state “non-compliance” based on the information and/or its presentation in the report. |
| Question/Requirement | 3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
| Does the institution have a policy or procedure to ensure other accreditors are notified when a change in status occurs, including voluntary withdrawal from accreditation? | Target is met; question or requirement is clearly addressed with examples/samples that are easy to understand. Anyone reviewing this would gain knowledge of how the College meets/addresses this standard. No clarity is required. Full Compliance evident with Question/Requirement
|
Target is met; question or requirement is addressed with examples/samples; however, may not be clear to an external reviewer. I, in reviewing this information, still have some minor questions and/or feel the evidence (examples/ samples) provided do not demonstrate with 100% certainty compliance with this question/requirement
|
Target is addressed; however not clearly enough to demonstrate compliance. Partial Compliance may be evident, but this needs more explanation and/or documentation | Target in NOT met – This really misses the mark; any reviewer would state “non-compliance” based on the information and/or its presentation in the report. |
| Question/Requirement | 3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
| Who is responsible for ensuring this notification occurs? | Target is met; question or requirement is clearly addressed with examples/samples that are easy to understand. Anyone reviewing this would gain knowledge of how the College meets/addresses this standard. No clarity is required. Full Compliance evident with Question/Requirement
|
Target is met; question or requirement is addressed with examples/samples; however, may not be clear to an external reviewer. I, in reviewing this information, still have some minor questions and/or feel the evidence (examples/ samples) provided do not demonstrate with 100% certainty compliance with this question/requirement
|
Target is addressed; however not clearly enough to demonstrate compliance. Partial Compliance may be evident, but this needs more explanation and/or documentation | Target in NOT met – This really misses the mark; any reviewer would state “non-compliance” based on the information and/or its presentation in the report. |
Included
|
Not Included
|
|
| Excerpts from reports prepared for other accreditors or reports by other accreditors.
|
||
| Screenshots and printouts on the institution from accreditor websites and directories.
|
||
| Printout from the USDE accreditation database.
|
||
| Copies of letters mailed to SACSCOC notifying of a change in accreditor status (and any letter received in return).
|
| Comments:
|